Title: Immediate bonding effectiveness of contemporary composite cements to dentin
Authors: Sarr, Mouhamed
Mine, Atsushi
De Munck, Jan
Vivan Cardoso, Marcio
Kane, Abdoul Wakhabe
Vreven, José
Van Meerbeek, Bart
Van Landuyt, Kirsten # ×
Issue Date: Oct-2010
Publisher: Springer
Series Title: Clinical Oral Investigations vol:14 issue:5 pages:569-577
Abstract: The objective of this study was to compare the one-week bonding effectiveness of nine contemporary composite cements used to lute ceramic to dentin and to determine an appropriate processing method for pretesting failures. The microtensile bond strengths (microTBS) of different luting agents including five self-adhesive cements (Unicem, 3 M ESPE; Maxcem, Kerr; Monocem, Shofu; G-Cem, GC; and Multilink Sprint, Ivoclar-Vivadent), two self-etch cements (Panavia F2.0 and Clearfil Esthetic Cement, Kuraray), and two etch-and-rinse cements (Calibra, Dentsply, and Variolink II, Ivoclar-Vivadent) were measured using a standardized protocol. As control, a two-step self-etch adhesive combined with a restorative composite (Clearfil SE+Clearfil APX, Kuraray) were included as luting material. Depending on the processing of the pretesting failures, two groups of cements could be distinguished: (1) those with low bond strength and many pretesting failures and (2) those with relatively high bond strength and few pretesting failures. Nevertheless, the control luting procedure involving a self-etch adhesive combined with a restorative composite presented with a significantly higher microTBS. The microTBS was clearly product-dependent rather than being dependent on the actual adhesive approach. Fracture analysis indicated that failure usually occurred at the dentin-cement interface especially for the cements with low bond strength and many pretesting failures. Depending on the cement system, an adequate immediate ceramic-to-dentin bond strength can be obtained, even with self-adhesive cements that do not use a separate dental adhesive. Yet, the self-etch adhesive Clearfil SE combined with the restorative composite revealed a superior bonding performance and should therefore be preferred in clinical situations where the restoration transmits light sufficiently.
ISSN: 1432-6981
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Clinical Residents Dentistry
Biomaterials - BIOMAT
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
Sarr - 2010 - Immediate bonding - Clin Oral Investig.pdf Published 312KbAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

These files are only available to some KU Leuven Association staff members


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science