Title: Hand-assisted laparoscopy versus conventional median laparotomy for aortobifemoral bypass for severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease: a prospective randomised study
Authors: Fourneau, Inge ×
Sabbe, T
Daenens, Kim
Nevelsteen, André #
Issue Date: Dec-2006
Series Title: European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery vol:32 issue:6 pages:645-50
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate that hand-assisted laparoscopy for aortofemoral bypass for severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease reduces morbidity with earlier recovery of bowel function and shorter in-hospital stay. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six consecutive patients with severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease (TASK C/D) without history of major abdominal surgery necessitating an aortobifemoral bypass were randomised between a hand-assisted laparoscopic (HALS) approach and a conventional medial laparotomy. Operative data, early recovery data, quality of life and vascular outcome were analysed. RESULTS: No significant differences in operative data were found. Fluid and solid diet were resumed earlier (28.8 hrs vs. 76.9 hrs; p = 0.016) (45.6 hrs vs. 105.6 hrs; p = 0.02) and in-hospital stay was shorter (7.5 vs. 8.9 days; p = 0.005) in the HALS group. Six weeks post-operatively social functioning measured by the SF-36 survey score was better in patients randomised to HALS (p=0.023). CONCLUSIONS: HALS is a less invasive approach for aortofemoral bypass.
ISSN: 1078-5884
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Vascular Surgery
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
60 Fourneau.doc Published 110KbMicrosoft WordView/Open Request a copy

These files are only available to some KU Leuven Association staff members


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

© Web of science