Title: Why the human brain is not an enlarged chimpanzee brain
Authors: De Smedt, Johan
De Cruz, Helen
Braeckman, Johan
Issue Date: 2009
Publisher: Cambridge Scholars
Host Document: Human Characteristics: Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Mind and Kind pages:168-181
Conference: Human Mind - Human Kind, Inter-disciplinary conference on human characteristics location:University of Aarhus date:15-18 August 2007
Article number: 8
Abstract: Following Darwin, many comparative psychologists assume that the human mind is a kind of ape mind, differing only in degree from the extant apes – we call this the mental continuity assumption. However, the continuity principle in evolutionary theory does not posit continuity between extant closely related species, but between extant species and their extinct ancestors. Thus, it is possible that some human cognitive capacities have no parallels in extant apes, but that they emerged in extinct hominid species after the human-chimpanzee divergence. Our examination of the case of social cognition from an archaeological and comparative psychological perspective suggests that the human brain is not simply an enlarged chimpanzee brain. Instead, natural selection seems to have favoured a different social cognition in both species.
ISBN: 978-1-4438-0213-0
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IHb
Appears in Collections:Centre for Logic and Analytical Philosophy

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
DeSmedtetal_humanchar_final.pdf Published 3009KbAdobe PDFView/Open


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.