Title: 'Spam, spam, spam, spam … Lovely spam!' Why is Bluespam different?
Authors: Kosta, Eleni ×
Valcke, Peggy
Stevens, David #
Issue Date: Mar-2009
Publisher: Routledge
Series Title: International Review of Law, Computers & Technology vol:23 issue:1&2 pages:89-97
Abstract: The sending of unsolicited communications (commonly known as ‘spam’) is considered as a great intrusion into the privacy of the user of electronic communications services,
and is therefore regulated in Article 13 of the ePrivacy directive. At the time of the adoption of the directive, the most common ways of spamming were via telephone, fax, electronic mail and SMS. Technological progress, however, has since created more types of spamming, one of which is Bluespam, i.e. the action of sending spam to Bluetooth-enabled devices, such as mobile phones, PDAs or laptop computers. Although, at first sight, it would seem that Bluespam should be considered as any other type of spam, and would therefore fall under the ambit of Article 13 of the ePrivacy directive, a closer look reveals that the answer is in fact not so obvious.
ISSN: 1360-0869
VABB publication type: VABB-1
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Research Unit KU Leuven Centre for IT & IP Law (CiTiP)
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Request a copy


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.