Title: Why Logic Doesn't Matter in the (Philosophical) Study of Argumentation
Authors: Heysse, Tim # ×
Issue Date: May-1997
Publisher: D. Reidel
Series Title: Argumentation vol:11 issue:2 pages:211-224
Abstract: Philosophically, the study of argumentation is important because it holds out the prospect of an interpretation of rationality. For this we need to identify a transcendent perspective on the argumentative interaction. We need a normative theory of argumentation that provides an answer to the question: should the hearer accept the argument of the speaker. In this article I argue that formal logic implies a notion of transcendence that is not suitable for the study of argumentation, because, from a logical point of view, argumentation ‘disappears from sight’. We should therefore not expect formal logic to provide an interesting interpretation of the rationality intrinsic in argument and discussion.
ISSN: 0920-427X
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IT
Appears in Collections:Centre for Ethics, Social and Political Philosophy
× corresponding author
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:
File Description Status SizeFormat
214755_fulltext.pdf Published 47KbAdobe PDFView/Open


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.