Download PDF

The 3rd European Conference of Apidology, Date: 2008/09/08 - 2008/09/11, Location: Queen's University Belfast (UK)

Publication date: 2008-01-01
Pages: 31 -

Proceedings of EurBee3

Author:

Ernst, Uli
Wenseleers, Tom ; Verleyen, Peter ; Cardoen, Dries ; de Graaf, Dirk C ; Schoofs, Liliane ; Ratnieks, Francis LW

Abstract:

The classic view of insect colonies as harmonic societies has been challenged in the last decades. It became clear that several conflicts ‘loom’ below the peaceful surface. One conflict is about male parentage, as some workers are capable of producing viable male eggs and are sometimes favoured by selection to do so. Yet, there are methods in place to reduce or solve these conflicts. Worker policing in social Hymenoptera (by removal of worker laid eggs) was predicted in 1984 and first reported in the honeybee (Apis mellifera) in 1989. Various models try to explain the origin and maintenance of policing in terms of inclusive fitness theory. Much effort has been invested into the search for signals or cues of egg provenance. Less is known about the organization of policing within a colony. Recent studies in several taxa suggest a specialization in policing behaviour. We aim to provide the first insight into the task allocation of worker policing in honeybees. Therefore, we will follow cohorts of individually marked bees of known age in an observation hive, using focal sampling methods, to study the work profile of policing honeybee workers. A predisposition for policing might be indicated by inspecting cells, especially on drone combs. By introducing worker laid eggs in drone cells, we will be able to observe actual events of policing. Policing and non-policing bees of the same age will be sampled and their ovaries dissected. A possibly inherited bias for policing will be detected by microsatellite analysis of patrilines. Starr C.K. 1984. in: Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. (ed. Smith R. L.) 427-464 2 Ratnieks F.L.W, Vischer P.K. 1989. Nature 342: 796-797 3 Ratnieks F.L.W. et al. 2006. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 51: 581-608 4 Martin S.J. et al. 2005. J. Negat. Res. Ecol. Evol. 2: 1-9 5 Van Zweden J.S. et al. 2007. Proc. R. Soc. B 274: 1421-1428