Title: Comparative optimism: Even more robust than might be expected?
Authors: Smits, Tim
Hoorens, Vera #
Issue Date: Jun-2002
Conference: General Meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology edition:13 location:San Sebastian date:26-29 June 2002
Abstract: To test if comparative optimism occurs when people estimate the likelihood of personally relevant rather than experimenter-provided events, students were asked to write down events that might happen in either their own future or in the future of the average student and that were either ‘desirable or undesirable’ or ‘controllable or uncontrollable’. They estimated both their own likelihood and the average peer student’s likelihood to experience each event. Participants named more desirable events for themselves than for the average other. In addition, the likelihood estimates for oneself and the average other yielded a ‘traditional’ demonstration of comparative optimism using idiosyncratic rather than experimenter-provided stimulus events. Interestingly, participants did not name more controllable events for themselves than for the average other, thus further demonstrating the relative independence of comparative optimism and the illusion of comparative control. The implications of these findings for the nature and scope of comparative optimism are discussed.
Publication status: published
KU Leuven publication type: IMa
Appears in Collections:Social and Cultural Psychology
European Centre for Ethics
# (joint) last author

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


All items in Lirias are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.