Download PDF (external access)

Dento maxillo facial radiology

Publication date: 2005-05-29
Volume: 34 Pages: 145 - 149
Publisher: British Institute of Radiology

Author:

Gijbels, Frieda
Jacobs, Reinhilde ; Bogaerts, Maria ; Debaveye, D ; Verlinden, S ; Sanderink, G

Keywords:

Bone Marrow, Brain, Environmental Exposure, Facial Bones, Humans, Phantoms, Imaging, Radiation Dosage, Radiography, Dental, Digital, Radiography, Panoramic, Relative Biological Effectiveness, Salivary Glands, Skin, Thermoluminescent Dosimetry, X-Ray Intensifying Screens, Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging, dental radiography, panoramic radiography, digital imaging, radiation dose, DENTAL RADIOLOGY, DOSE REDUCTION, RADIOGRAPHY, GLAND, FILM, ACCURACY, QUALITY, TUMORS, 1103 Clinical Sciences, 1105 Dentistry, Dentistry, 3202 Clinical sciences, 3203 Dentistry

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: To measure patient radiation dose during panoramic exposure with various panoramic units for digital panoramic imaging. METHODS: An anthropomorphic phantom was filled with thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLD 100) and exposed with five different digital panoramic units during ten consecutive exposures. Four machines were equipped with a direct digital CCD (charge coupled device) system, whereas one of the units used storage phosphor plates (indirect digital technique). The exposure settings recommended by the different manufacturers for the particular image and patient size were used: tube potential settings ranged between 64 kV and 74 kV, exposure times between 8.2 s and 19.0 s, at fuse current values between 4 mA and 7 mA. The effective radiation dose was calculated with inclusion of the salivary glands. RESULTS: Effective radiation doses ranged between 4.7 microSv and 14.9 microSv for one exposure. Salivary glands absorbed the most radiation for all panoramic units. When indirect and direct digital panoramic systems were compared, the effective dose of the indirect digital unit (8.1 microSv) could be found within the range of the effective doses for the direct digital units (4.7-14.9 microSv). CONCLUSIONS: A rather wide range of patient radiation doses can be found for digital panoramic units. There is a tendency for lower effective doses for digital compared with analogue panoramic units, reported in previous studies.